Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Work & Co (3.9/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.8/5) overall. Work & Co is the better choice for premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution.. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams that want a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 425+ | 12–50 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | Premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution. | Budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams that want a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
Work & Co
Founded in May 2013 by Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo, Work & Co is headquartered in Dumbo, Brooklyn with additional offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. The studio's client roster includes Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney — a notably premium list for a firm of its size (425+ people). Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, an ownership detail worth disclosing alongside its design credentials.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio was founded in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency' and rebranded to Spaceberry in 2020; 2016 is used as the founding year here since it is the same continuous team and entity. Headquartered in Ukraine with an additional London, UK location, the studio reports 12–50 employees depending on source. Spaceberry offers subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps — one of two subscription-model comparators in this roster alongside Eleken, giving budget-conscious teams a lower-commitment entry point.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | Work & Co | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | Work & Co | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | Work & Co | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster (Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney) is unusually strong relative to the firm's headcount |
| + | Engineering-heavy delivery model means design and build happen under one roof, reducing hand-off risk |
| + | 425+ people across US, Europe, and Latin America gives real multi-region coverage |
| + | Strong track record on premium consumer digital product launches |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song — the same parent company as Accenture Song itself in this roster, an ownership overlap worth noting |
| - | Premium client roster suggests premium pricing, though no minimum engagement is published |
| - | Less specialized in any single vertical (fintech, healthcare) than boutique competitors |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry in this roster |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location alongside its Ukraine base gives some geographic diversification |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, including through its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this list, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, meaning some pre-2020 case studies may be under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients who prefer a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose Work & Co?
Work & Co is the right choice for premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution..
Engineering-led product design studio with an unusually premium client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) for its size. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the right choice for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams that want a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
One of the most accessible entry points in this roster via a subscription-style engagement model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio
Work & Co (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Engineering-led product design studio with an unusually premium client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) for its size. It is best for premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution..
Spaceberry Studio (3.8/5) is the better choice when budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams that want a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Spaceberry Studio?
Work & Co (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co is better for premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution.. Spaceberry Studio is better for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams that want a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
How do Work & Co and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Spaceberry Studio?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: engineering-led product design studio with an unusually premium client roster (apple, ikea, nike, disney) for its size. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this roster via a subscription-style engagement model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (425+ vs 12–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.