Frog vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Frog (3.9/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.8/5) overall. Frog is the better choice for enterprises needing design that spans both digital products and physical hardware, delivered within a large consulting engagement.. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams that want a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Frog vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Frog | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1969 | 2016 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 2,000+ | 12–50 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | Enterprises needing design that spans both digital products and physical hardware, delivered within a large consulting engagement. | Budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams that want a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract. |
| Pricing model | Project-based, enterprise consulting engagements | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Miro | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Frog vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
Frog
Frog traces back to 1969 as Esslinger Design in Germany, later rebranding as frog design and being acquired by Aricent, then Altran, and finally absorbed into Capgemini Invent in 2019 — a chain of ownership changes worth disclosing to prospective clients. Capgemini has folded additional agencies (Fahrenheit 212, Idean, June21) into the frog brand, bringing headcount to roughly 2,000 across 35 global studios. Frog's differentiator is spanning both software and physical hardware — IoT, smart-home, automotive, and medical devices — rather than digital-only work.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio was founded in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency' and rebranded to Spaceberry in 2020; 2016 is used as the founding year here since it is the same continuous team and entity. Headquartered in Ukraine with an additional London, UK location, the studio reports 12–50 employees depending on source. Spaceberry offers subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps — one of two subscription-model comparators in this roster alongside Eleken, giving budget-conscious teams a lower-commitment entry point.
Services and capabilities: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | Frog | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | Frog | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | Frog | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | Frog | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Connected hardware and IoT product design, Automotive and smart-home interface design | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Frog vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| Frog | |
|---|---|
| + | Rare combined software + physical hardware design capability (IoT, automotive, medical devices) |
| + | 35 global studios provide multi-region enterprise coverage |
| + | Half a century of brand history and case studies to draw on |
| + | Capgemini Invent backing gives access to broader technology-consulting resources |
| - | Now a consulting-firm brand inside Capgemini Invent, not an independent boutique — clients should factor in the ownership structure |
| - | Multiple legacy agencies (Fahrenheit 212, Idean, June21) were absorbed into the frog brand, which can mean inconsistent team continuity project to project |
| - | Consulting-firm overhead and process can slow smaller, faster-moving engagements |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry in this roster |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location alongside its Ukraine base gives some geographic diversification |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, including through its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this list, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, meaning some pre-2020 case studies may be under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients who prefer a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose Frog?
Frog is the right choice for enterprises needing design that spans both digital products and physical hardware, delivered within a large consulting engagement..
One of the few agencies in this list spanning both software and physical/IoT hardware design, at Capgemini Invent scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the right choice for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams that want a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
One of the most accessible entry points in this roster via a subscription-style engagement model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Frog |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Frog (Not published) vs Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Frog |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | Frog fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connected hardware and IoT product design | Strong | Limited | Frog |
| Automotive and smart-home interface design | Strong | Limited | Frog |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
Frog (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. One of the few agencies in this list spanning both software and physical/IoT hardware design, at Capgemini Invent scale. It is best for enterprises needing design that spans both digital products and physical hardware, delivered within a large consulting engagement..
Spaceberry Studio (3.8/5) is the better choice when budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams that want a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Frog vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is Frog better than Spaceberry Studio?
Frog (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Frog is better for enterprises needing design that spans both digital products and physical hardware, delivered within a large consulting engagement.. Spaceberry Studio is better for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams that want a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
How do Frog and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
Frog uses project-based, enterprise consulting engagements pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Frog or Spaceberry Studio?
Frog is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Frog and Spaceberry Studio?
Frog's primary differentiator is: one of the few agencies in this list spanning both software and physical/iot hardware design, at capgemini invent scale. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this roster via a subscription-style engagement model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (2,000+ vs 12–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.