Frog vs Work & Co: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Work & Co (3.8/5) edges ahead of Frog (3.7/5) overall. Work & Co is the better choice for premium brands, design paired with strong engineering. Frog is the stronger option for enterprises needing digital plus physical product design. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Frog vs Work & Co: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Frog | Work & Co |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1969 | 2013 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA |
| Team size | 2,000+ | ~400 (at the 2024 Accenture acquisition) |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Designs physical hardware (IoT, automotive, medical devices) and the software on it within one team, a pairing most firms on this list dropped years ago | An engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song |
| Pricing model | Project-based, enterprise consulting engagements | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Miro | Figma, React, Next.js |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare |
Frog vs Work & Co: overview
Frog
frog started in Germany in 1969 as Esslinger Design and moved through Aricent and Altran before Capgemini folded it into Capgemini Invent. Capgemini then merged Fahrenheit 212, Idean, and June21 into the frog brand, which puts the practice at roughly 2,000 people across 35 studios. Physical product work is what separates it here. frog still designs IoT devices, car interiors, and medical hardware alongside the software that runs on them, and very few firms on this page can say the same. No restructuring or leadership news specific to frog had surfaced as of November 2026.
Work & Co
Five co-founders started Work & Co in Dumbo, Brooklyn, in May 2013: Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo. Its client list is out of proportion to its size. Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney have all hired a studio of roughly 400 people, largely because designers and front-end engineers ship together on the same team. Accenture announced its acquisition in January 2024, and the studio now operates within Accenture Song while keeping its own brand and careers site.
Services and capabilities: Frog vs Work & Co
| Capability | Frog | Work & Co |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Frog vs Work & Co
| Framework / platform | Frog | Work & Co |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Frog vs Work & Co
| Criterion | Frog | Work & Co |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Frog vs Work & Co
| Dimension | Frog | Work & Co |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Connected hardware and IoT product design, Automotive or smart-home interface design | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Frog vs Work & Co: pros and cons
| Frog | |
|---|---|
| + | Hardware-plus-software design across IoT, automotive, and medical devices |
| + | 35 studios give genuine multi-region coverage for global programs |
| + | Five decades of design history to pull case studies from |
| + | Capgemini Invent's technology consultants are available when a project grows past design |
| - | You're hiring a Capgemini Invent brand, and procurement will treat it like one |
| - | Several absorbed agencies (Fahrenheit 212, Idean, June21) now share the name, so team continuity between projects can vary |
| - | Consulting-firm overhead slows small, fast projects compared with a boutique |
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list of Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, and Disney is rare for a studio of about 400 people |
| + | Designers and engineers ship together, so there's no hand-off to a separate build vendor |
| + | Offices across the US, Europe, and Latin America |
| + | Long record of flagship consumer launches |
| - | Part of Accenture Song since Accenture's 2024 acquisition, the same parent as the Accenture Song listing here |
| - | No published minimum, though the client list points to premium pricing |
| - | Fewer fintech- or healthcare-specific case studies than vertical specialists |
Who should choose Frog?
A typical fit: connected hardware and IoT product design.
Designs physical hardware (IoT, automotive, medical devices) and the software on it within one team, a pairing most firms on this list dropped years ago. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare.
Who should choose Work & Co?
A typical fit: flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand.
An engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Frog vs Work & Co
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Frog |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Frog (Not published) vs Work & Co (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Frog |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Frog vs Work & Co
| Use case | Frog fit | Work & Co fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connected hardware and IoT product design | Strong | Limited | Frog |
| Automotive or smart-home interface design | Strong | Limited | Frog |
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Limited | Strong | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Limited | Strong | Work & Co |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Frog vs Work & Co
Work & Co (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. An engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song.
Frog (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need automotive or smart-home interface design. If your situation matches that, Frog is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Frog vs Work & Co FAQ
Is Frog better than Work & Co?
Work & Co (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Frog's strongest advantage: hardware-plus-software design across IoT, automotive, and medical devices. Work & Co's strongest advantage: client list of Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, and Disney is rare for a studio of about 400 people.
How do Frog and Work & Co differ in pricing?
Frog uses project-based, enterprise consulting engagements pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Frog or Work & Co?
Work & Co is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Frog and Work & Co?
Frog's primary differentiator is: designs physical hardware (IoT, automotive, medical devices) and the software on it within one team, a pairing most firms on this list dropped years ago. Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song. They also differ in team size (2,000+ vs ~400 (at the 2024 Accenture acquisition)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs Consumer products, Enterprise transformation).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.