Work & Co vs Eleken: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Eleken (4.2/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.9/5) overall. Eleken is the better choice for saaS companies that want an embedded designer on a predictable monthly subscription instead of a fixed-price project contract.. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Eleken: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | Distributed team, roots in Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 425+ | 40+ to 100+ (approximate; reported figures vary by source) |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best for | Premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution. | SaaS companies that want an embedded designer on a predictable monthly subscription instead of a fixed-price project contract. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Subscription (dedicated full-time or part-time designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Design systems/Storybook, Miro |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software |
Work & Co vs Eleken: overview
Work & Co
Founded in May 2013 by Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo, Work & Co is headquartered in Dumbo, Brooklyn with additional offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. The studio's client roster includes Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney — a notably premium list for a firm of its size (425+ people). Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, an ownership detail worth disclosing alongside its design credentials.
Eleken
Founded in 2015 with roots in Kyiv, Ukraine, Eleken operates as a distributed team and reports 40+ to 100+ designers depending on source (treated as approximate). The studio uses a subscription pricing model — roughly $6,599/month for a dedicated full-time designer, with part-time also available — a distinctive engagement model versus the project-based competitors elsewhere in this roster. Eleken holds a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects and 70+ published case studies, and is SaaS-only, working on complex B2B, AI, data, and geospatial and low-code/no-code products through an embedded-team model.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Eleken
| Capability | Work & Co | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Eleken
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Eleken
| Criterion | Work & Co | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Eleken
| Dimension | Work & Co | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap, Complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Work & Co vs Eleken: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster (Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney) is unusually strong relative to the firm's headcount |
| + | Engineering-heavy delivery model means design and build happen under one roof, reducing hand-off risk |
| + | 425+ people across US, Europe, and Latin America gives real multi-region coverage |
| + | Strong track record on premium consumer digital product launches |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song — the same parent company as Accenture Song itself in this roster, an ownership overlap worth noting |
| - | Premium client roster suggests premium pricing, though no minimum engagement is published |
| - | Less specialized in any single vertical (fintech, healthcare) than boutique competitors |
| Eleken | |
|---|---|
| + | 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ completed projects and 70+ published case studies |
| + | Subscription embedded-team model gives predictable monthly cost versus a large fixed-price contract |
| + | SaaS-only focus, including complex B2B, AI, data, and geospatial products, builds genuine vertical depth |
| + | Part-time subscription option available for teams that don't need a full-time dedicated designer |
| - | Reported team size varies widely by source (40+ to 100+), making capacity planning less precise |
| - | SaaS-only positioning means no fit for consumer, healthcare, or brand-led engagements |
| - | Subscription model can cost more than a fixed-price project for short, well-defined engagements |
Who should choose Work & Co?
Work & Co is the right choice for premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution..
Engineering-led product design studio with an unusually premium client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) for its size. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Eleken?
Eleken is the right choice for saaS companies that want an embedded designer on a predictable monthly subscription instead of a fixed-price project contract..
Subscription embedded-team model (~$6,599/month) exclusively for SaaS, backed by a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects. Minimum engagement starts at $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Eleken
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Eleken ($6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Eleken
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Eleken fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| Embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap | Limited | Strong | Eleken |
| Complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Eleken |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Eleken
Eleken (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Subscription embedded-team model (~$6,599/month) exclusively for SaaS, backed by a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects. It is best for saaS companies that want an embedded designer on a predictable monthly subscription instead of a fixed-price project contract..
Work & Co (3.9/5) is the better choice when premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution.. If your situation matches those criteria, Work & Co is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Eleken FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Eleken?
Eleken (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co is better for premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution.. Eleken is better for saaS companies that want an embedded designer on a predictable monthly subscription instead of a fixed-price project contract..
How do Work & Co and Eleken differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Eleken uses subscription (dedicated full-time or part-time designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Eleken?
Eleken is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Eleken?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: engineering-led product design studio with an unusually premium client roster (apple, ikea, nike, disney) for its size. Eleken's primary differentiator is: subscription embedded-team model (~$6,599/month) exclusively for saas, backed by a 4.9 clutch rating across 200+ projects. They also differ in team size (425+ vs 40+ to 100+ (approximate; reported figures vary by source)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.