IDEO vs Frog: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Frog (3.7/5) edges ahead of IDEO (3.6/5) overall. Frog is the better choice for enterprises needing digital plus physical product design. IDEO is the stronger option for enterprises that want design capability built inside their own teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
IDEO vs Frog: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | IDEO | Frog |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1991 | 1969 |
| HQ | San Francisco Bay Area, CA, USA (offices in the US, UK, and China) | San Francisco, CA, USA |
| Team size | Not published (about a third of staff cut before 2025, per Fortune) | 2,000+ |
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Three decades of human-centered design history, now aimed at building clients' in-house design and innovation capability | Designs physical hardware (IoT, automotive, medical devices) and the software on it within one team, a pairing most firms on this list dropped years ago |
| Pricing model | Project-based, enterprise engagements (not published) | Project-based, enterprise consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | $300K+ (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Miro, Adobe Creative Suite | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Miro |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare |
IDEO vs Frog: overview
IDEO
IDEO's last few years have been rough. Fortune reported in May 2026 that the firm had cut about a third of its staff, closed its Munich and Tokyo offices, and watched revenue fall below $100M from roughly $300M four years earlier. Mike Peng, who joined IDEO in 2006 and helped open the Tokyo studio, became CEO in 2025 and is pushing the firm toward teaching client organizations to run design work themselves. The history is still real: IDEO formed in 1991 from four merged studios, designed the original Apple mouse, and has belonged to the kyu collective under Hakuhodo DY Holdings since kyu first invested in 2016. Industry roundups still put typical minimums near $300K (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable).
Frog
frog started in Germany in 1969 as Esslinger Design and moved through Aricent and Altran before Capgemini folded it into Capgemini Invent. Capgemini then merged Fahrenheit 212, Idean, and June21 into the frog brand, which puts the practice at roughly 2,000 people across 35 studios. Physical product work is what separates it here. frog still designs IoT devices, car interiors, and medical hardware alongside the software that runs on them, and very few firms on this page can say the same. No restructuring or leadership news specific to frog had surfaced as of November 2026.
Services and capabilities: IDEO vs Frog
| Capability | IDEO | Frog |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: IDEO vs Frog
| Framework / platform | IDEO | Frog |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | ✓ |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: IDEO vs Frog
| Criterion | IDEO | Frog |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $300K+ (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: IDEO vs Frog
| Dimension | IDEO | Frog |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Enterprise-wide digital transformation strategy paired with design execution, Large-scale patient experience redesign for a hospital system | Connected hardware and IoT product design, Automotive or smart-home interface design |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
IDEO vs Frog: pros and cons
| IDEO | |
|---|---|
| + | Still the reference point for human-centered design methods, with case studies going back to the original Apple mouse |
| + | CEO Mike Peng has a stated plan to train client teams so they keep designing after IDEO leaves |
| + | Publishes original research, including a 2026 Innovation Quotient survey of more than 250 product and innovation executives |
| + | Membership in Hakuhodo DY Holdings' kyu collective opens the door to sister firms when a project needs them |
| - | Fortune's May 2026 reporting describes a one-third staff cut and closed Munich and Tokyo offices, so ask exactly who would staff your project |
| - | A reported $300K+ typical minimum (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable) keeps it out of reach for startups |
| - | Part of the kyu collective owned by Hakuhodo DY Holdings since 2016, so it isn't a fully independent firm |
| Frog | |
|---|---|
| + | Hardware-plus-software design across IoT, automotive, and medical devices |
| + | 35 studios give genuine multi-region coverage for global programs |
| + | Five decades of design history to pull case studies from |
| + | Capgemini Invent's technology consultants are available when a project grows past design |
| - | You're hiring a Capgemini Invent brand, and procurement will treat it like one |
| - | Several absorbed agencies (Fahrenheit 212, Idean, June21) now share the name, so team continuity between projects can vary |
| - | Consulting-firm overhead slows small, fast projects compared with a boutique |
Who should choose IDEO?
A typical fit: enterprise-wide digital transformation strategy paired with design execution.
Three decades of human-centered design history, now aimed at building clients' in-house design and innovation capability. Minimum engagement starts at $300K+ (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare.
Who should choose Frog?
A typical fit: connected hardware and IoT product design.
Designs physical hardware (IoT, automotive, medical devices) and the software on it within one team, a pairing most firms on this list dropped years ago. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: IDEO vs Frog
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | IDEO |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | IDEO |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: IDEO ($300K+ (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable)) vs Frog (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | IDEO |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: IDEO vs Frog
| Use case | IDEO fit | Frog fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise-wide digital transformation strategy paired with design execution | Strong | Limited | IDEO |
| Large-scale patient experience redesign for a hospital system | Strong | Limited | IDEO |
| Connected hardware and IoT product design | Limited | Strong | Frog |
| Automotive or smart-home interface design | Limited | Strong | Frog |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: IDEO vs Frog
Frog (3.7/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Designs physical hardware (IoT, automotive, medical devices) and the software on it within one team, a pairing most firms on this list dropped years ago.
IDEO (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need large-scale patient experience redesign for a hospital system. If your situation matches that, IDEO is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
IDEO vs Frog FAQ
Is IDEO better than Frog?
Frog (3.7/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. IDEO's strongest advantage: still the reference point for human-centered design methods, with case studies going back to the original Apple mouse. Frog's strongest advantage: hardware-plus-software design across IoT, automotive, and medical devices.
How do IDEO and Frog differ in pricing?
IDEO uses project-based, enterprise engagements (not published) pricing with a minimum engagement of $300K+ (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable). Frog uses project-based, enterprise consulting engagements pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: IDEO or Frog?
IDEO is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between IDEO and Frog?
IDEO's primary differentiator is: three decades of human-centered design history, now aimed at building clients' in-house design and innovation capability. Frog's primary differentiator is: designs physical hardware (IoT, automotive, medical devices) and the software on it within one team, a pairing most firms on this list dropped years ago. They also differ in team size (Not published (about a third of staff cut before 2025, per Fortune) vs 2,000+), minimum engagement ($300K+ (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs Enterprise transformation, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.