Excited vs UX studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Excited (4.5/5) edges ahead of UX studio (4.4/5) overall. Excited is the better choice for SaaS/fintech teams wanting an award-winning specialist at mid-market rates. UX studio is the stronger option for complex B2B SaaS, research-first design partner. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Excited vs UX studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Excited | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2013 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (also Tallinn, Estonia) | Budapest, Hungary |
| Team size | 10–49 (Clutch listing) | ~50 (per company job postings; Clutch lists 10–49) |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 reviews and four Red Dot awards, focused narrowly on SaaS and fintech | Research-first B2B SaaS design with a 5.0 Clutch rating across 41 reviews, comparable in method to Phenomenon Studio's discovery-first approach |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, After Effects | Figma, Dovetail, Maze |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software |
Excited vs UX studio: overview
Excited
Excited holds a 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 verified reviews as of November 2026, and the agency says Clutch has consistently placed it in the top 5 of its global UX leaders matrix. Founded in Lviv in 2018, it added a Tallinn office and keeps its practice narrow: UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion for SaaS and fintech clients. Its awards shelf has grown too, with four Red Dot, three Webby, two Lovie, and one iF award listed on its site. Clutch reviewers most often mention project management and communication, and the listed minimum is $10K+.
UX studio
UX studio's Clutch profile reads 5.0 across 41 reviews, with a $10K+ minimum and $50–$99 hourly rates. David Pasztor founded the Budapest studio in 2013, and it now presents itself as a dedicated UX partner for B2B SaaS teams, with research coming before interface work on every project. The team is smaller than older figures suggested: the company's own 2026 job posts describe a 50-person studio, and Clutch lists 10–49. It also builds its own products, UXfolio and Copyfolio, so its designers know what shipping SaaS feels like from the inside.
Services and capabilities: Excited vs UX studio
| Capability | Excited | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Excited vs UX studio
| Framework / platform | Excited | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Excited vs UX studio
| Criterion | Excited | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Excited vs UX studio
| Dimension | Excited | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software |
| Best use cases | SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign, Discovery-phase UX research before a full product build |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Excited vs UX studio: pros and cons
| Excited | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 verified reviews, with 5.0 sub-scores for quality and willingness to refer |
| + | Four Red Dot, three Webby, two Lovie, and one iF award (per company website) |
| + | SaaS and fintech focus builds genuine domain depth |
| + | $10K+ minimum and $50–$99 hourly rates (per Clutch listing) |
| - | Clutch lists 10–49 employees, which limits capacity for large parallel workstreams |
| - | Lviv headquarters carries the same continuity questions as other Ukraine-based teams, partly offset by the Tallinn office |
| - | SaaS/fintech focus makes it a weaker fit for healthcare or consumer work |
| UX studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0 Clutch rating across 41 reviews |
| + | Research comes before UI on every project, documented in its published case studies |
| + | Builds and runs its own SaaS products (UXfolio, Copyfolio) |
| + | $10K+ minimum (per Clutch listing) is accessible for a research-led studio |
| - | Team is around 50 people, smaller than earlier 60–71 figures, which limits parallel projects |
| - | B2B SaaS focus makes it a weaker fit for consumer, healthcare, or fintech-specific products |
| - | Research-first sequencing adds time before screens appear |
Who should choose Excited?
A typical fit: SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company.
A 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 reviews and four Red Dot awards, focused narrowly on SaaS and fintech. Minimum engagement starts at $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.
Who should choose UX studio?
A typical fit: complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign.
Research-first B2B SaaS design with a 5.0 Clutch rating across 41 reviews, comparable in method to Phenomenon Studio's discovery-first approach. Minimum engagement starts at $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software.
Decision matrix: Excited vs UX studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Excited |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Excited |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Excited |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Excited |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Excited vs UX studio
| Use case | Excited fit | UX studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Strong | Limited | Excited |
| Complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign | Limited | Strong | UX studio |
| Discovery-phase UX research before a full product build | Limited | Strong | UX studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Excited vs UX studio
Excited (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 reviews and four Red Dot awards, focused narrowly on SaaS and fintech.
UX studio (4.4/5) is worth a look if you need discovery-phase UX research before a full product build. If your situation matches that, UX studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Excited vs UX studio FAQ
Is Excited better than UX studio?
Excited (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Excited's strongest advantage: 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 verified reviews, with 5.0 sub-scores for quality and willingness to refer. UX studio's strongest advantage: 5.0 Clutch rating across 41 reviews.
How do Excited and UX studio differ in pricing?
Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K+ (per Clutch listing). UX studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Excited or UX studio?
UX studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Excited and UX studio?
Excited's primary differentiator is: a 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 reviews and four Red Dot awards, focused narrowly on SaaS and fintech. UX studio's primary differentiator is: research-first B2B SaaS design with a 5.0 Clutch rating across 41 reviews, comparable in method to Phenomenon Studio's discovery-first approach. They also differ in team size (10–49 (Clutch listing) vs ~50 (per company job postings; Clutch lists 10–49)), minimum engagement ($10K+ (per Clutch listing) vs $10K+ (per Clutch listing)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.