Phenomenon Studio vs Excited: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Phenomenon Studio (4.9/5) edges ahead of Excited (4.5/5) overall. Phenomenon Studio is the better choice for founders needing one accountable team, not a design/dev hand-off. Excited is the stronger option for SaaS/fintech teams wanting an award-winning specialist at mid-market rates. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Phenomenon Studio vs Excited: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Phenomenon Studio | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| HQ | Dover, DE, USA (also Tallinn, Estonia and Lugano, Switzerland) | Lviv, Ukraine (also Tallinn, Estonia) |
| Team size | 90+ (company figure; Clutch lists 50–249) | 10–49 (Clutch listing) |
| Rating | 4.9 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Runs discovery before design starts, then keeps the same senior team through development and post-launch support; 92% of clients return for more work (per company website) | A 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 reviews and four Red Dot awards, focused narrowly on SaaS and fintech |
| Pricing model | Project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, React | Figma, Framer, After Effects |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech |
Phenomenon Studio vs Excited: overview
Phenomenon Studio
Phenomenon Studio runs a discovery phase before any design file opens, and the people who shape the roadmap are the same people who ship the product. Co-founders Valerii Filimonov and Polina Chebanova started the studio in 2019. It now has 90+ designers and developers working from Dover (Delaware), Tallinn, and Lugano, plus a North American office that Vancouver studio Polyform became in March 2025. The studio reports 624 projects for 311 clients across SaaS, healthcare, fintech, and EdTech, says 92% of those clients come back for more work, and counts $500M+ raised by the companies it has worked with (per company website). The outside checks hold up: a 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 reviews, HIPAA compliance assessed by Compliancy Group, and a 2026 UX Design Awards nomination for Wisdom, a safety app for seniors.
Excited
Excited holds a 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 verified reviews as of November 2026, and the agency says Clutch has consistently placed it in the top 5 of its global UX leaders matrix. Founded in Lviv in 2018, it added a Tallinn office and keeps its practice narrow: UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion for SaaS and fintech clients. Its awards shelf has grown too, with four Red Dot, three Webby, two Lovie, and one iF award listed on its site. Clutch reviewers most often mention project management and communication, and the listed minimum is $10K+.
Services and capabilities: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Capability | Phenomenon Studio | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Framework / platform | Phenomenon Studio | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Criterion | Phenomenon Studio | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Dimension | Phenomenon Studio | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | A SaaS product entering a Series B raise that needs its interface rebuilt before investor diligence, A healthcare platform that must hit HIPAA compliance while modernizing its UX | SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Phenomenon Studio vs Excited: pros and cons
| Phenomenon Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Discovery comes before design on every engagement, which lowers the odds of building the wrong thing well |
| + | One team owns strategy, design, development, and post-launch support, so nothing is handed between vendors |
| + | 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 reviews |
| + | HIPAA program assessed by Compliancy Group and renewed in August 2026 (per company), with GDPR-aligned delivery |
| + | Nielsen Norman Group UX-certified designers and four Webflow certifications (101, CMS, Experts, Layouts) |
| + | 92% of clients return for further work (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| - | The discovery phase adds time before visible design work, a real cost for teams that want to start production immediately |
| - | No product or growth marketing services, so post-launch promotion needs a separate vendor |
| - | Clutch lists a $10K+ minimum, but a firm quote still requires a discovery call |
| Excited | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 verified reviews, with 5.0 sub-scores for quality and willingness to refer |
| + | Four Red Dot, three Webby, two Lovie, and one iF award (per company website) |
| + | SaaS and fintech focus builds genuine domain depth |
| + | $10K+ minimum and $50–$99 hourly rates (per Clutch listing) |
| - | Clutch lists 10–49 employees, which limits capacity for large parallel workstreams |
| - | Lviv headquarters carries the same continuity questions as other Ukraine-based teams, partly offset by the Tallinn office |
| - | SaaS/fintech focus makes it a weaker fit for healthcare or consumer work |
Who should choose Phenomenon Studio?
A typical fit: a SaaS product entering a Series B raise that needs its interface rebuilt before investor diligence.
Runs discovery before design starts, then keeps the same senior team through development and post-launch support; 92% of clients return for more work (per company website). Minimum engagement starts at $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech.
Who should choose Excited?
A typical fit: SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company.
A 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 reviews and four Red Dot awards, focused narrowly on SaaS and fintech. Minimum engagement starts at $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Phenomenon Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Phenomenon Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Phenomenon Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Phenomenon Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Use case | Phenomenon Studio fit | Excited fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A SaaS product entering a Series B raise that needs its interface rebuilt before investor diligence | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A healthcare platform that must hit HIPAA compliance while modernizing its UX | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
Phenomenon Studio (4.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Runs discovery before design starts, then keeps the same senior team through development and post-launch support; 92% of clients return for more work (per company website).
Excited (4.5/5) is worth a look if you need fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish. If your situation matches that, Excited is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Phenomenon Studio vs Excited FAQ
Is Phenomenon Studio better than Excited?
Phenomenon Studio (4.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Phenomenon Studio's strongest advantage: discovery comes before design on every engagement, which lowers the odds of building the wrong thing well. Excited's strongest advantage: 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 verified reviews, with 5.0 sub-scores for quality and willingness to refer.
How do Phenomenon Studio and Excited differ in pricing?
Phenomenon Studio uses project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Phenomenon Studio or Excited?
Phenomenon Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Phenomenon Studio and Excited?
Phenomenon Studio's primary differentiator is: runs discovery before design starts, then keeps the same senior team through development and post-launch support; 92% of clients return for more work (per company website). Excited's primary differentiator is: a 5.0 Clutch rating across 56 reviews and four Red Dot awards, focused narrowly on SaaS and fintech. They also differ in team size (90+ (company figure; Clutch lists 50–249) vs 10–49 (Clutch listing)), minimum engagement ($10K+ (per Clutch listing) vs $10K+ (per Clutch listing)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.