Best Product Design Agencies

Work & Co vs Ramotion: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Ramotion (3.9/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.8/5) overall. Ramotion is the better choice for Startups/mid-market, brand identity plus product design. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium brands, design paired with strong engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Work & Co vs Ramotion: head-to-head summary

Criterion Work & Co Ramotion
Founded 2013 2009
HQ Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA San Francisco, CA, USA
Team size ~400 (at the 2024 Accenture acquisition) 10–49 per Clutch (company states 70+ experts)
Rating 3.8 / 5 3.9 / 5
Primary differentiator An engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song Bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Fixed project, T&M
Min. engagement Not published $50K+ (per Clutch listing)
Primary tech stack Figma, React, Next.js Figma, Webflow, React
Industries served Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products

Work & Co vs Ramotion: overview

Work & Co

Five co-founders started Work & Co in Dumbo, Brooklyn, in May 2013: Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo. Its client list is out of proportion to its size. Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney have all hired a studio of roughly 400 people, largely because designers and front-end engineers ship together on the same team. Accenture announced its acquisition in January 2024, and the studio now operates within Accenture Song while keeping its own brand and careers site.

Ramotion

Ramotion has worked out of San Francisco since 2009 and now lists offices in New York, Los Angeles, and Austin too. How big is it? The company cites 70+ experts, while Clutch puts it at 10–49 employees. Clutch also shows a 4.9 rating across 29 reviews, a $50K+ minimum project, and $150–$199 hourly rates, roughly double the $25K minimum it quoted earlier. The work spans brand identity, UX/UI, and web and mobile development for startups through Fortune 500 companies.

Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Ramotion

Capability Work & Co Ramotion
Product design ✓ ✓
UX research ✗ ✗
Branding ✗ ✓
Web development ✓ ✓
Mobile development ✓ ✗
Design systems ✗ ✗

Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Ramotion

Framework / platform Work & Co Ramotion
Figma ✓ ✓
Webflow N/A ✓
React ✓ ✓
Framer N/A N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A ✓
Design systems/Storybook N/A N/A
After Effects N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Ramotion

Criterion Work & Co Ramotion
Minimum engagement Not published $50K+ (per Clutch listing)
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project, Time & materials
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Accessible

Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Ramotion

Dimension Work & Co Ramotion
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products
Best use cases Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup, Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Work & Co vs Ramotion: pros and cons

Work & Co
+ Client list of Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, and Disney is rare for a studio of about 400 people
+ Designers and engineers ship together, so there's no hand-off to a separate build vendor
+ Offices across the US, Europe, and Latin America
+ Long record of flagship consumer launches
- Part of Accenture Song since Accenture's 2024 acquisition, the same parent as the Accenture Song listing here
- No published minimum, though the client list points to premium pricing
- Fewer fintech- or healthcare-specific case studies than vertical specialists
Ramotion
+ 4.9 Clutch rating across 29 reviews
+ Brand identity, product design, and app development from one team
+ Offices in San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles, and Austin
+ Works with both early-stage startups and Fortune 500 brands
- Team size claims diverge: 70+ experts per the company, 10–49 employees per Clutch
- Minimum project is now $50K+ with $150–$199 hourly rates (per Clutch listing)
- Brand-plus-product positioning gives up some depth to product-only studios

Who should choose Work & Co?

A typical fit: flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand.

An engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.

Who should choose Ramotion?

A typical fit: brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup.

Bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies. Minimum engagement starts at $50K+ (per Clutch listing). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.

Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Ramotion

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Work & Co
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Work & Co
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Ramotion ($50K+ (per Clutch listing))
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Work & Co
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Work & Co vs Ramotion

Use case Work & Co fit Ramotion fit Winner
Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand Strong Limited Work & Co
E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering Strong Limited Work & Co
Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup Strong Strong Both equally
Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company Limited Strong Ramotion
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Work & Co vs Ramotion

Ramotion (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies.

Work & Co (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need e-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering. If your situation matches that, Work & Co is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Work & Co vs Ramotion FAQ

Is Work & Co better than Ramotion?

Ramotion (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co's strongest advantage: client list of Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, and Disney is rare for a studio of about 400 people. Ramotion's strongest advantage: 4.9 Clutch rating across 29 reviews.

How do Work & Co and Ramotion differ in pricing?

Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Ramotion uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $50K+ (per Clutch listing). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Ramotion?

Work & Co is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Work & Co and Ramotion?

Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song. Ramotion's primary differentiator is: bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies. They also differ in team size (~400 (at the 2024 Accenture acquisition) vs 10–49 per Clutch (company states 70+ experts)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $50K+ (per Clutch listing)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).

Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.