Work & Co vs Qubstudio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Qubstudio (4.6/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.8/5) overall. Qubstudio is the better choice for banks and fintechs, from MVP through enterprise redesign. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium brands, design paired with strong engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Qubstudio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2006 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | Lviv, Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | ~400 (at the 2024 Accenture acquisition) | 50–249 (Clutch listing) |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | An engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song | Ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch in 2026, with measurable banking results (Gulf Bank's app rating rose from 1.9 to 4.8) and a 4.9 rating across 94 reviews |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Sketch, Webflow |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech, Logistics |
Work & Co vs Qubstudio: overview
Work & Co
Five co-founders started Work & Co in Dumbo, Brooklyn, in May 2013: Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo. Its client list is out of proportion to its size. Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney have all hired a studio of roughly 400 people, largely because designers and front-end engineers ship together on the same team. Accenture announced its acquisition in January 2024, and the studio now operates within Accenture Song while keeping its own brand and careers site.
Qubstudio
Clutch ranked Qubstudio the #1 UX/UI agency of 2026, and its client results show why. Kuwait's Gulf Bank saw its App Store rating climb from 1.9 to 4.8 after a Qubstudio redesign, and logistics marketplace BluePallet reports a 151% rise in daily and monthly active users (both per company case studies). The studio has 15+ years behind it and dates its founding to 2006 or 2007, depending on the source. Clutch lists headquarters in Lviv with an office in London, 50–249 employees, and a 4.9 rating across 94 reviews. Before 2026, the company says, it held a Clutch top-five spot every year from 2017, and its Red Dot recognition includes a Best of the Best award. Most of its work is in retail and corporate banking and fintech, with logistics, EdTech, HR tech, and healthcare alongside.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Capability | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Criterion | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Dimension | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Fintech MVP launch design, Logistics platform UX overhaul |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs Qubstudio: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list of Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, and Disney is rare for a studio of about 400 people |
| + | Designers and engineers ship together, so there's no hand-off to a separate build vendor |
| + | Offices across the US, Europe, and Latin America |
| + | Long record of flagship consumer launches |
| - | Part of Accenture Song since Accenture's 2024 acquisition, the same parent as the Accenture Song listing here |
| - | No published minimum, though the client list points to premium pricing |
| - | Fewer fintech- or healthcare-specific case studies than vertical specialists |
| Qubstudio | |
|---|---|
| + | Ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch in 2026, with a 4.9 rating across 94 reviews |
| + | Published client results, including Gulf Bank's App Store rating rising from 1.9 to 4.8 (per company case study) |
| + | Red Dot recognition, including a Best of the Best award, plus UX Design Awards honors |
| + | Banking depth across retail and corporate clients such as Gulf Bank and ila Bank |
| - | Clutch lists 50–249 employees, a wide band that makes exact capacity hard to judge |
| - | Founding year differs by source (2006 vs. 2007) |
| - | The main delivery team is in Lviv, which raises the same continuity questions as other Ukraine-based studios |
Who should choose Work & Co?
A typical fit: flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand.
An engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Qubstudio?
A typical fit: fintech MVP launch design.
Ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch in 2026, with measurable banking results (Gulf Bank's app rating rose from 1.9 to 4.8) and a 4.9 rating across 94 reviews. Minimum engagement starts at $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Qubstudio ($10K+ (per Clutch listing)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Qubstudio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Qubstudio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| Fintech MVP launch design | Limited | Strong | Qubstudio |
| Logistics platform UX overhaul | Limited | Strong | Qubstudio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
Qubstudio (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch in 2026, with measurable banking results (Gulf Bank's app rating rose from 1.9 to 4.8) and a 4.9 rating across 94 reviews.
Work & Co (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need e-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering. If your situation matches that, Work & Co is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Qubstudio FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Qubstudio?
Qubstudio (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co's strongest advantage: client list of Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, and Disney is rare for a studio of about 400 people. Qubstudio's strongest advantage: ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch in 2026, with a 4.9 rating across 94 reviews.
How do Work & Co and Qubstudio differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Qubstudio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Qubstudio?
Work & Co is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Qubstudio?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song. Qubstudio's primary differentiator is: ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch in 2026, with measurable banking results (Gulf Bank's app rating rose from 1.9 to 4.8) and a 4.9 rating across 94 reviews. They also differ in team size (~400 (at the 2024 Accenture acquisition) vs 50–249 (Clutch listing)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $10K+ (per Clutch listing)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs Financial services / fintech, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.