Work & Co vs Big Human: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Big Human (4.0/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.8/5) overall. Big Human is the better choice for Startups/consumer brands, small senior studio, product builders. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium brands, design paired with strong engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Big Human: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Big Human |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2010 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | New York, NY, USA (remote team) |
| Team size | ~400 (at the 2024 Accenture acquisition) | 10–49 (Clutch listing) |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | An engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song | A compact, senior remote team that has worked on consumer hits like HQ Trivia and Vine and also builds its own startups |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, React, Node.js |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Consumer products, Media & entertainment, Financial services / fintech |
Work & Co vs Big Human: overview
Work & Co
Five co-founders started Work & Co in Dumbo, Brooklyn, in May 2013: Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo. Its client list is out of proportion to its size. Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney have all hired a studio of roughly 400 people, largely because designers and front-end engineers ship together on the same team. Accenture announced its acquisition in January 2024, and the studio now operates within Accenture Song while keeping its own brand and careers site.
Big Human
Big Human is small on purpose. Clutch lists 10–49 employees and a 2010 founding date (other sources say 2011), and the team works remotely from a New York base. That scale hasn't kept it off large accounts: Whistle, Rockefeller Center, Gemini, and Netflix appear in its portfolio, and the studio worked on HQ Trivia and Vine. Its 12 Clutch reviews average 4.9, with 2026 reviews covering rebrands for a fan platform and an AI concierge product. Pricing and minimums stay unpublished.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Big Human
| Capability | Work & Co | Big Human |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Big Human
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Big Human |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Big Human
| Criterion | Work & Co | Big Human |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Big Human
| Dimension | Work & Co | Big Human |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Consumer products, Media & entertainment, Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Consumer app design for an early-stage or growth-stage startup, Brand-plus-product design bundle for a media or entertainment client |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs Big Human: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list of Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, and Disney is rare for a studio of about 400 people |
| + | Designers and engineers ship together, so there's no hand-off to a separate build vendor |
| + | Offices across the US, Europe, and Latin America |
| + | Long record of flagship consumer launches |
| - | Part of Accenture Song since Accenture's 2024 acquisition, the same parent as the Accenture Song listing here |
| - | No published minimum, though the client list points to premium pricing |
| - | Fewer fintech- or healthcare-specific case studies than vertical specialists |
| Big Human | |
|---|---|
| + | Worked on consumer products HQ Trivia and Vine, and incubates its own startups |
| + | Client list includes Whistle, Rockefeller Center, Gemini, and Netflix |
| + | 4.9 Clutch rating, with 2026 reviews covering brand and AI product work |
| + | Small team keeps clients in direct contact with senior people |
| - | Only 12 Clutch reviews, a thin sample compared with most boutiques here |
| - | 10–49 employees caps capacity for large programs |
| - | Founding year differs by source (2010 vs. 2011), and pricing isn't published |
Who should choose Work & Co?
A typical fit: flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand.
An engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Big Human?
A typical fit: consumer app design for an early-stage or growth-stage startup.
A compact, senior remote team that has worked on consumer hits like HQ Trivia and Vine and also builds its own startups. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Media & entertainment, Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Big Human
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Big Human (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Big Human
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Big Human fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| Consumer app design for an early-stage or growth-stage startup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Brand-plus-product design bundle for a media or entertainment client | Limited | Strong | Big Human |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Big Human
Big Human (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A compact, senior remote team that has worked on consumer hits like HQ Trivia and Vine and also builds its own startups.
Work & Co (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need e-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering. If your situation matches that, Work & Co is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Big Human FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Big Human?
Big Human (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co's strongest advantage: client list of Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, and Disney is rare for a studio of about 400 people. Big Human's strongest advantage: worked on consumer products HQ Trivia and Vine, and incubates its own startups.
How do Work & Co and Big Human differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Big Human uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Big Human?
Work & Co is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Big Human?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-heavy studio whose client list (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) outsizes its ~400-person team, now part of Accenture Song. Big Human's primary differentiator is: a compact, senior remote team that has worked on consumer hits like HQ Trivia and Vine and also builds its own startups. They also differ in team size (~400 (at the 2024 Accenture acquisition) vs 10–49 (Clutch listing)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs Consumer products, Media & entertainment).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.