Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of UXDA (4.3/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record.. UXDA is the stronger option for banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX, with no distraction from other verticals.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| HQ | Dnipro, Ukraine | Riga, Latvia |
| Team size | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) | 25+ |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best for | Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record. | Banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX, with no distraction from other verticals. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, retainer |
| Min. engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, After Effects | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail | Financial services / fintech |
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: overview
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio states it has operated 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; the founding year is treated as self-reported), and is headquartered in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than publishing a specific headcount, the studio describes itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' with 500+ completed projects. Gapsy holds a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews and 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush, covering UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development for fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.
UXDA
UXDA (Financial UX Design) was founded in 2015 by Alex Kreger and co-founder Linda, and is headquartered in Riga, Latvia with a team of 25+ multidisciplinary specialists. Over the past decade, UXDA has defined or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms across 39 countries. UXDA is exclusively focused on financial services, fintech, and banking UX — making it the clearest fintech specialist among the boutiques in this roster.
Services and capabilities: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Capability | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Framework / platform | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Dimension | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: pros and cons
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster |
| + | 13+ international design awards spanning Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Serves five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail), offering broad vertical coverage |
| - | Does not publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to assess delivery capacity than studios with published team sizes |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Broad five-industry positioning means somewhat less deep specialization than single-vertical boutiques like UXDA |
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Exclusive financial-services focus means deep domain expertise most generalist studios cannot match |
| + | 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade |
| + | Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management |
| + | A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation builds compounding domain knowledge |
| - | Exclusive fintech focus is a liability for any client outside financial services |
| - | $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is on the higher end for a 25-person boutique |
| - | Small team size (25+) limits capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs |
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record..
5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international design awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Who should choose UXDA?
UXDA is the right choice for banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX, with no distraction from other verticals..
The only agency in this roster exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Gapsy Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Gapsy Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Use case | Gapsy Studio fit | UXDA fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Bank digital platform redesign | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international design awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. It is best for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record..
UXDA (4.3/5) is the better choice when banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX, with no distraction from other verticals.. If your situation matches those criteria, UXDA is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA FAQ
Is Gapsy Studio better than UXDA?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record.. UXDA is better for banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX, with no distraction from other verticals..
How do Gapsy Studio and UXDA differ in pricing?
Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Gapsy Studio or UXDA?
Gapsy Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Gapsy Studio and UXDA?
Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international design awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only agency in this roster exclusively focused on financial services ux, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) vs 25+), minimum engagement ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software vs Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.