Gapsy Studio vs Eleken: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Eleken (4.2/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record.. Eleken is the stronger option for saaS companies that want an embedded designer on a predictable monthly subscription instead of a fixed-price project contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Gapsy Studio vs Eleken: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| HQ | Dnipro, Ukraine | Distributed team, roots in Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) | 40+ to 100+ (approximate; reported figures vary by source) |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best for | Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record. | SaaS companies that want an embedded designer on a predictable monthly subscription instead of a fixed-price project contract. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Subscription (dedicated full-time or part-time designer) |
| Min. engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, After Effects | Figma, Design systems/Storybook, Miro |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail | SaaS / B2B software |
Gapsy Studio vs Eleken: overview
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio states it has operated 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; the founding year is treated as self-reported), and is headquartered in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than publishing a specific headcount, the studio describes itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' with 500+ completed projects. Gapsy holds a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews and 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush, covering UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development for fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.
Eleken
Founded in 2015 with roots in Kyiv, Ukraine, Eleken operates as a distributed team and reports 40+ to 100+ designers depending on source (treated as approximate). The studio uses a subscription pricing model — roughly $6,599/month for a dedicated full-time designer, with part-time also available — a distinctive engagement model versus the project-based competitors elsewhere in this roster. Eleken holds a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects and 70+ published case studies, and is SaaS-only, working on complex B2B, AI, data, and geospatial and low-code/no-code products through an embedded-team model.
Services and capabilities: Gapsy Studio vs Eleken
| Capability | Gapsy Studio | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Eleken
| Framework / platform | Gapsy Studio | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Eleken
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Eleken
| Dimension | Gapsy Studio | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software |
| Best use cases | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap, Complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Gapsy Studio vs Eleken: pros and cons
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster |
| + | 13+ international design awards spanning Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Serves five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail), offering broad vertical coverage |
| - | Does not publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to assess delivery capacity than studios with published team sizes |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Broad five-industry positioning means somewhat less deep specialization than single-vertical boutiques like UXDA |
| Eleken | |
|---|---|
| + | 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ completed projects and 70+ published case studies |
| + | Subscription embedded-team model gives predictable monthly cost versus a large fixed-price contract |
| + | SaaS-only focus, including complex B2B, AI, data, and geospatial products, builds genuine vertical depth |
| + | Part-time subscription option available for teams that don't need a full-time dedicated designer |
| - | Reported team size varies widely by source (40+ to 100+), making capacity planning less precise |
| - | SaaS-only positioning means no fit for consumer, healthcare, or brand-led engagements |
| - | Subscription model can cost more than a fixed-price project for short, well-defined engagements |
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record..
5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international design awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Who should choose Eleken?
Eleken is the right choice for saaS companies that want an embedded designer on a predictable monthly subscription instead of a fixed-price project contract..
Subscription embedded-team model (~$6,599/month) exclusively for SaaS, backed by a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects. Minimum engagement starts at $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software.
Decision matrix: Gapsy Studio vs Eleken
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Gapsy Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Gapsy Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Gapsy Studio vs Eleken
| Use case | Gapsy Studio fit | Eleken fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap | Limited | Strong | Eleken |
| Complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Eleken |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Gapsy Studio vs Eleken
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international design awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. It is best for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record..
Eleken (4.2/5) is the better choice when saaS companies that want an embedded designer on a predictable monthly subscription instead of a fixed-price project contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Eleken is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Gapsy Studio vs Eleken FAQ
Is Gapsy Studio better than Eleken?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record.. Eleken is better for saaS companies that want an embedded designer on a predictable monthly subscription instead of a fixed-price project contract..
How do Gapsy Studio and Eleken differ in pricing?
Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Eleken uses subscription (dedicated full-time or part-time designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Gapsy Studio or Eleken?
Eleken is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Gapsy Studio and Eleken?
Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international design awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. Eleken's primary differentiator is: subscription embedded-team model (~$6,599/month) exclusively for saas, backed by a 4.9 clutch rating across 200+ projects. They also differ in team size (Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) vs 40+ to 100+ (approximate; reported figures vary by source)), minimum engagement ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software vs SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.