R/GA vs Fireart Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Fireart Studio (4.3/5) edges ahead of R/GA (3.8/5) overall. Fireart Studio is the better choice for Startups/mid-market, design plus full development, one studio. R/GA is the stronger option for large brands that want product design and marketing from one partner. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
R/GA vs Fireart Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | R/GA | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1977 | 2013 |
| HQ | New York City, NY, USA | Warsaw, Poland (Ukraine-founded roots) |
| Team size | ~2,000 | 50–249 (Clutch listing) |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Pairs product design with brand and marketing strategy, and since going independent has been buying and building AI design capability | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients and a 4.9 Clutch rating, with design and development from one Warsaw team |
| Pricing model | Project-based, retainer for ongoing programs | Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, After Effects | Figma, React, Next.js |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
R/GA vs Fireart Studio: overview
R/GA
Since buying itself back from Interpublic Group in March 2025, with majority backing from Truelink Capital, R/GA has moved quickly. It set up a $50M innovation fund, launched a global AI products team, and made the first acquisition in its nearly 50-year history: Addition, an AI system design studio. In September 2026 it hired former Google executive Sadie Thoma as its first global chief business officer. The agency has run out of New York since 1977 and now works from ten countries, including Austin, London, São Paulo, Singapore, and Stockholm. Product design still arrives bundled with brand and marketing strategy.
Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio's numbers are steady: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, a 4.9 Clutch rating across 40 reviews, and a $10K+ minimum project with $50–$99 hourly rates. The studio was founded in 2013 with Ukrainian roots and now lists a single location in Warsaw, with 50–249 employees on Clutch. Clutch has named it a top UX design team and web development firm, and the studio says it has ranked among Dribbble's top 10 teams. Reviewers praise the design work; the recurring complaint is time estimates that slip.
Services and capabilities: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Capability | R/GA | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Framework / platform | R/GA | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Criterion | R/GA | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $10K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Dimension | R/GA | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch, Enterprise digital product with a marketing or campaign component | End-to-end SaaS product design and development, Startup MVP design and build |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
R/GA vs Fireart Studio: pros and cons
| R/GA | |
|---|---|
| + | Product design and marketing strategy come from one team, which saves large brands a second vendor |
| + | Acquired AI system design studio Addition, its first acquisition, funded from a $50M innovation fund |
| + | Offices in ten countries across North America, Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific |
| + | Leadership bench keeps growing after the buyout, including a first global chief business officer hired in September 2026 |
| - | Ownership changed in 2025 and the AI products team is new, so ask how much of that capability would touch your project |
| - | Trade-press reports of 25% year-on-year revenue growth in Q1 2026 come from the agency itself |
| - | Marketing-led positioning and large-brand pricing fit early-stage product teams poorly |
| Fireart Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients since 2013 |
| + | 4.9 Clutch rating across 40 reviews, with a 5.0 quality sub-score |
| + | Clutch recognition as a top UX design team and web development firm |
| + | $10K+ minimum (per Clutch listing) is among the lowest on this list |
| - | Some Clutch reviewers report time estimates that led to project delays |
| - | Its review count hasn't grown much recently, so current references are worth asking for |
| - | Development-heavy delivery leaves less room for research-led design work |
Who should choose R/GA?
A typical fit: consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch.
Pairs product design with brand and marketing strategy, and since going independent has been buying and building AI design capability. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose Fireart Studio?
A typical fit: end-to-end SaaS product design and development.
700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients and a 4.9 Clutch rating, with design and development from one Warsaw team. Minimum engagement starts at $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | R/GA |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Fireart Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: R/GA (Not published) vs Fireart Studio ($10K+ (per Clutch listing)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | R/GA |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Use case | R/GA fit | Fireart Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch | Strong | Limited | R/GA |
| Enterprise digital product with a marketing or campaign component | Strong | Limited | R/GA |
| End-to-end SaaS product design and development | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Startup MVP design and build | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients and a 4.9 Clutch rating, with design and development from one Warsaw team.
R/GA (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need enterprise digital product with a marketing or campaign component. If your situation matches that, R/GA is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
R/GA vs Fireart Studio FAQ
Is R/GA better than Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. R/GA's strongest advantage: product design and marketing strategy come from one team, which saves large brands a second vendor. Fireart Studio's strongest advantage: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients since 2013.
How do R/GA and Fireart Studio differ in pricing?
R/GA uses project-based, retainer for ongoing programs pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Fireart Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: R/GA or Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between R/GA and Fireart Studio?
R/GA's primary differentiator is: pairs product design with brand and marketing strategy, and since going independent has been buying and building AI design capability. Fireart Studio's primary differentiator is: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients and a 4.9 Clutch rating, with design and development from one Warsaw team. They also differ in team size (~2,000 vs 50–249 (Clutch listing)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $10K+ (per Clutch listing)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.