Best Product Design Agencies

Fantasy vs Halo Lab: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Halo Lab (4.4/5) edges ahead of Fantasy (3.8/5) overall. Halo Lab is the better choice for e-commerce and web-app teams wanting design and build at mid-market rates. Fantasy is the stronger option for enterprises designing AI products, independent senior studio. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Fantasy vs Halo Lab: head-to-head summary

Criterion Fantasy Halo Lab
Founded 1999 2013
HQ San Francisco, CA, USA (also New York, NY) Dubai, UAE (per Clutch; Ukraine-rooted, 20+ listed locations)
Team size Not published 150+ (company figure; Clutch lists 50–249)
Rating 3.8 / 5 4.4 / 5
Primary differentiator Independently owned for 25+ years, with recent enterprise AI platform work for BNY and Salesforce A 4.9 Clutch rating across 100 reviews, the largest review base among boutiques here, with design and development in one 150-person team
Pricing model Project-based (not published) Fixed project, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not published $10K+ (per Clutch listing)
Primary tech stack Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Miro Figma, Webflow, React
Industries served Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Automotive & mobility SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail, Consumer products

Fantasy vs Halo Lab: overview

Fantasy

Fantasy, originally Fantasy Interactive, has stayed independent since 1999 while most agencies its age sold to a holding company. Its studios in San Francisco and New York have worked for Nike, Disney, Microsoft, Netflix, Spotify, Ford, Google, and Samsung. What's changed lately is the type of work. LBB Online credits list a Salesforce digital ecosystem redesign in June 2026 and a BNY enterprise AI platform and design system in July 2026, and the studio's own essays now focus on generative software. Team size still isn't published.

Halo Lab

Halo Lab has the largest review base among the boutiques here: a 4.9 Clutch rating across 100 reviews as of November 2026. Clutch dates the company to 2013, lists its headquarters in Dubai, and shows more than 20 locations, though the team's roots are in Ukraine. The company describes 150+ specialists in design, engineering, and product management, 300+ clients, and 500+ projects. Its Clutch minimum is $10K+ with $25–$49 hourly rates. Halo Lab used to be described as Dribbble's #1 team, but that ranking doesn't appear on Dribbble's current team listings.

Services and capabilities: Fantasy vs Halo Lab

Capability Fantasy Halo Lab
Product design ✓ ✓
UX research ✓ ✗
Branding ✓ ✓
Web development ✗ ✓
Mobile development ✗ ✓
Design systems ✗ ✗

Tech stack comparison: Fantasy vs Halo Lab

Framework / platform Fantasy Halo Lab
Figma ✓ ✓
Webflow N/A ✓
React N/A ✓
Framer ✓ N/A
Adobe Creative Suite ✓ N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A N/A
After Effects N/A ✓

Pricing comparison: Fantasy vs Halo Lab

Criterion Fantasy Halo Lab
Minimum engagement Not published $10K+ (per Clutch listing)
Engagement models Fixed project, Retainer Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Accessible

Target audience comparison: Fantasy vs Halo Lab

Dimension Fantasy Halo Lab
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Automotive & mobility SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail, Consumer products
Best use cases Consumer product design for an established or legacy-adjacent brand, AI feature design layered onto an existing product E-commerce platform redesign, Marketing site plus product design bundle
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Fantasy vs Halo Lab: pros and cons

Fantasy
+ Independently owned since 1999, so there's no holding-company layer between you and the studio
+ Recent enterprise AI work, including a BNY AI platform and design system credited in July 2026
+ Client history covering Nike, Disney, Microsoft, Netflix, and Spotify
+ Offers full-stack engineering alongside research and experience design
- No published team size, so delivery capacity is hard to judge
- Marquee clients suggest enterprise pricing, and no minimum is published
- The AI-platform portfolio is recent, with fewer finished case studies than its older consumer work
Halo Lab
+ 4.9 Clutch rating across 100 reviews
+ $10K+ minimum and $25–$49 hourly rates (per Clutch listing)
+ 150+ specialists cover design, engineering, and product management
+ Covers web apps, marketing sites, e-commerce, and mobile
- Earlier '#1 Dribbble team' claims couldn't be verified against Dribbble's current listings
- Headquarters, founding year, and team size differ between Clutch and the company's own site
- Broad service range means less depth than fintech- or research-focused boutiques

Who should choose Fantasy?

A typical fit: consumer product design for an established or legacy-adjacent brand.

Independently owned for 25+ years, with recent enterprise AI platform work for BNY and Salesforce. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Automotive & mobility.

Who should choose Halo Lab?

A typical fit: e-commerce platform redesign.

A 4.9 Clutch rating across 100 reviews, the largest review base among boutiques here, with design and development in one 150-person team. Minimum engagement starts at $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail, Consumer products.

Decision matrix: Fantasy vs Halo Lab

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Fantasy
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Halo Lab
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Fantasy (Not published) vs Halo Lab ($10K+ (per Clutch listing))
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Fantasy
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Fantasy vs Halo Lab

Use case Fantasy fit Halo Lab fit Winner
Consumer product design for an established or legacy-adjacent brand Strong Limited Fantasy
AI feature design layered onto an existing product Strong Limited Fantasy
E-commerce platform redesign Limited Strong Halo Lab
Marketing site plus product design bundle Limited Strong Halo Lab
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Fantasy vs Halo Lab

Halo Lab (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 4.9 Clutch rating across 100 reviews, the largest review base among boutiques here, with design and development in one 150-person team.

Fantasy (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need AI feature design layered onto an existing product. If your situation matches that, Fantasy is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Fantasy vs Halo Lab FAQ

Is Fantasy better than Halo Lab?

Halo Lab (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Fantasy's strongest advantage: independently owned since 1999, so there's no holding-company layer between you and the studio. Halo Lab's strongest advantage: 4.9 Clutch rating across 100 reviews.

How do Fantasy and Halo Lab differ in pricing?

Fantasy uses project-based (not published) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Halo Lab uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K+ (per Clutch listing). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Fantasy or Halo Lab?

Halo Lab is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Fantasy and Halo Lab?

Fantasy's primary differentiator is: independently owned for 25+ years, with recent enterprise AI platform work for BNY and Salesforce. Halo Lab's primary differentiator is: a 4.9 Clutch rating across 100 reviews, the largest review base among boutiques here, with design and development in one 150-person team. They also differ in team size (Not published vs 150+ (company figure; Clutch lists 50–249)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $10K+ (per Clutch listing)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail).

Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.