Clay vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Clay (4.1/5) edges ahead of UXDA (4.1/5) overall. Clay is the better choice for B2B SaaS, AI, fintech — big-tech credibility, low profile. UXDA is the stronger option for banks and large fintechs with enterprise design budgets. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Clay vs UXDA: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Riga, Latvia |
| Team size | Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) | 10–49 (Clutch listing; company cites 25+) |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | An unusually large enterprise client roster (Coinbase, Meta, Google, Slack) for a studio that doesn't publish its own founding year or team size | The only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries |
| Pricing model | Fixed project | Fixed project, retainer ($200–$300/hour per Clutch listing) |
| Min. engagement | $50K+ (per Clutch listing) | $250K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, Webflow | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech |
Clay vs UXDA: overview
Clay
Clay (clay.global, unrelated to the AI sales-data company at clay.com) publishes little about itself and a lot about its clients: Coinbase, Uber, SendGrid, MoneyLion, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon, Toyota, and Samsung. Its Clutch profile fills some gaps with a 4.8 rating across 30 verified reviews, a $50K+ minimum project, and hourly rates of $150–$199. Reviewers mostly praise its project management and delivery timing. Founding year and team size remain unconfirmed outside the company.
UXDA
UXDA (Financial UX Design) does one thing: financial-services UX. Alex Kreger co-founded it in Riga in 2015, and the team has since shaped or governed 150+ banking and fintech platforms across 39 countries. Recent wins include a German Design Award 2025 for Mauritius Telecom's my.t money super-app and a 2025 Red Dot for UAE digital bank Liv X. The bigger change for buyers is price: its Clutch listing now shows a $250K+ minimum project and $200–$300 hourly rates, against the $30K figure quoted earlier. Clutch reviews average 4.8 across 21.
Services and capabilities: Clay vs UXDA
| Capability | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Clay vs UXDA
| Framework / platform | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Clay vs UXDA
| Criterion | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $50K+ (per Clutch listing) | $250K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Clay vs UXDA
| Dimension | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup, Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Clay vs UXDA: pros and cons
| Clay | |
|---|---|
| + | 4.8 Clutch rating across 30 verified reviews, with reviewers praising structured project management |
| + | Client list includes Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack, and Amazon |
| + | Repeated work across B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech products |
| + | Branding, UX, and product design come from one team |
| - | Founding year and team size aren't published or independently confirmed |
| - | $50K+ minimum and $150–$199 hourly rates (per Clutch listing) put it above most boutiques here |
| - | Easily confused with the unrelated AI company at clay.com |
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Works only on financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms across 39 countries |
| + | German Design Award 2025 and Red Dot 2025 wins for financial super-app and digital bank work |
| + | 4.8 Clutch rating across 21 reviews |
| + | Small senior team means clients deal directly with the people doing the work |
| - | $250K+ minimum and $200–$300 hourly rates (per Clutch listing) put it out of reach for most fintech startups |
| - | Exclusive financial-services focus rules it out for every other vertical |
| - | Clutch lists 10–49 employees, which caps capacity for multi-product programs |
Who should choose Clay?
A typical fit: AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup.
An unusually large enterprise client roster (Coinbase, Meta, Google, Slack) for a studio that doesn't publish its own founding year or team size. Minimum engagement starts at $50K+ (per Clutch listing). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products.
Who should choose UXDA?
A typical fit: bank digital platform redesign.
The only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $250K+ (per Clutch listing). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Clay vs UXDA
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Clay |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Clay |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Clay |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Clay vs UXDA
| Use case | Clay fit | UXDA fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Bank digital platform redesign | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Clay vs UXDA
Clay (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. An unusually large enterprise client roster (Coinbase, Meta, Google, Slack) for a studio that doesn't publish its own founding year or team size.
UXDA (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need fintech app UX for a regulated market. If your situation matches that, UXDA is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Clay vs UXDA FAQ
Is Clay better than UXDA?
Clay (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Clay's strongest advantage: 4.8 Clutch rating across 30 verified reviews, with reviewers praising structured project management. UXDA's strongest advantage: works only on financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms across 39 countries.
How do Clay and UXDA differ in pricing?
Clay uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of $50K+ (per Clutch listing). UXDA uses fixed project, retainer ($200–$300/hour per clutch listing) pricing with a minimum engagement of $250K+ (per Clutch listing). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Clay or UXDA?
UXDA is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Clay and UXDA?
Clay's primary differentiator is: an unusually large enterprise client roster (Coinbase, Meta, Google, Slack) for a studio that doesn't publish its own founding year or team size. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) vs 10–49 (Clutch listing; company cites 25+)), minimum engagement ($50K+ (per Clutch listing) vs $250K+ (per Clutch listing)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.