Big Human vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
UXDA (4.1/5) edges ahead of Big Human (4.0/5) overall. UXDA is the better choice for banks and large fintechs with enterprise design budgets. Big Human is the stronger option for Startups/consumer brands, small senior studio, product builders. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Big Human vs UXDA: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Big Human | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2010 | 2015 |
| HQ | New York, NY, USA (remote team) | Riga, Latvia |
| Team size | 10–49 (Clutch listing) | 10–49 (Clutch listing; company cites 25+) |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A compact, senior remote team that has worked on consumer hits like HQ Trivia and Vine and also builds its own startups | The only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, retainer ($200–$300/hour per Clutch listing) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $250K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Node.js | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Media & entertainment, Financial services / fintech | Financial services / fintech |
Big Human vs UXDA: overview
Big Human
Big Human is small on purpose. Clutch lists 10–49 employees and a 2010 founding date (other sources say 2011), and the team works remotely from a New York base. That scale hasn't kept it off large accounts: Whistle, Rockefeller Center, Gemini, and Netflix appear in its portfolio, and the studio worked on HQ Trivia and Vine. Its 12 Clutch reviews average 4.9, with 2026 reviews covering rebrands for a fan platform and an AI concierge product. Pricing and minimums stay unpublished.
UXDA
UXDA (Financial UX Design) does one thing: financial-services UX. Alex Kreger co-founded it in Riga in 2015, and the team has since shaped or governed 150+ banking and fintech platforms across 39 countries. Recent wins include a German Design Award 2025 for Mauritius Telecom's my.t money super-app and a 2025 Red Dot for UAE digital bank Liv X. The bigger change for buyers is price: its Clutch listing now shows a $250K+ minimum project and $200–$300 hourly rates, against the $30K figure quoted earlier. Clutch reviews average 4.8 across 21.
Services and capabilities: Big Human vs UXDA
| Capability | Big Human | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Big Human vs UXDA
| Framework / platform | Big Human | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Big Human vs UXDA
| Criterion | Big Human | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $250K+ (per Clutch listing) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Big Human vs UXDA
| Dimension | Big Human | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Media & entertainment, Financial services / fintech | Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | Consumer app design for an early-stage or growth-stage startup, Brand-plus-product design bundle for a media or entertainment client | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Big Human vs UXDA: pros and cons
| Big Human | |
|---|---|
| + | Worked on consumer products HQ Trivia and Vine, and incubates its own startups |
| + | Client list includes Whistle, Rockefeller Center, Gemini, and Netflix |
| + | 4.9 Clutch rating, with 2026 reviews covering brand and AI product work |
| + | Small team keeps clients in direct contact with senior people |
| - | Only 12 Clutch reviews, a thin sample compared with most boutiques here |
| - | 10–49 employees caps capacity for large programs |
| - | Founding year differs by source (2010 vs. 2011), and pricing isn't published |
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Works only on financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms across 39 countries |
| + | German Design Award 2025 and Red Dot 2025 wins for financial super-app and digital bank work |
| + | 4.8 Clutch rating across 21 reviews |
| + | Small senior team means clients deal directly with the people doing the work |
| - | $250K+ minimum and $200–$300 hourly rates (per Clutch listing) put it out of reach for most fintech startups |
| - | Exclusive financial-services focus rules it out for every other vertical |
| - | Clutch lists 10–49 employees, which caps capacity for multi-product programs |
Who should choose Big Human?
A typical fit: consumer app design for an early-stage or growth-stage startup.
A compact, senior remote team that has worked on consumer hits like HQ Trivia and Vine and also builds its own startups. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Media & entertainment, Financial services / fintech.
Who should choose UXDA?
A typical fit: bank digital platform redesign.
The only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $250K+ (per Clutch listing). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Big Human vs UXDA
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Big Human |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Big Human |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Big Human (Not published) vs UXDA ($250K+ (per Clutch listing)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Big Human |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Big Human vs UXDA
| Use case | Big Human fit | UXDA fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer app design for an early-stage or growth-stage startup | Strong | Limited | Big Human |
| Brand-plus-product design bundle for a media or entertainment client | Strong | Limited | Big Human |
| Bank digital platform redesign | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Big Human vs UXDA
UXDA (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. The only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries.
Big Human (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need brand-plus-product design bundle for a media or entertainment client. If your situation matches that, Big Human is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Big Human vs UXDA FAQ
Is Big Human better than UXDA?
UXDA (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Big Human's strongest advantage: worked on consumer products HQ Trivia and Vine, and incubates its own startups. UXDA's strongest advantage: works only on financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms across 39 countries.
How do Big Human and UXDA differ in pricing?
Big Human uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. UXDA uses fixed project, retainer ($200–$300/hour per clutch listing) pricing with a minimum engagement of $250K+ (per Clutch listing). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Big Human or UXDA?
UXDA is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Big Human and UXDA?
Big Human's primary differentiator is: a compact, senior remote team that has worked on consumer hits like HQ Trivia and Vine and also builds its own startups. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (10–49 (Clutch listing) vs 10–49 (Clutch listing; company cites 25+)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $250K+ (per Clutch listing)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Media & entertainment vs Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.